Pet Peeve: The plague of misleading mobile gaming ads

Hands up if you’ve seen an advertisement for a mobile game that looks similar to the graphic above. The Flash-looking ad tends to show someone who is trapped in a precarious situation or trying to get to treasure that can only be achieved my manipulating the on-screen elements in a specific way. It’s an intriguing-looking puzzle, and the ad usually is animated and will show the puzzle failing while daring the viewer to download the game and do better.

And when said game is actually downloaded, it has absolutely nothing in common with those ads. It’s a completely different game, or a different type of puzzle game.

I’ve seen a lot of misleading gaming ads — anyone remember the hilarious run of Evony’s “Play Me, My Lord” a decade or so ago? — but this specific type of ad has been popping up on mobile, Facebook, and all sorts of other places for a while now. I keep bumping into it, and as a result, it’s become a major pet peeve of mine.

It’s not that it’s such a blatant bait-and-switch that is easily uncovered the second you actually go see what the real game looks like. It’s that these ads actually depict what might make for a pretty interesting game.

When I first saw these types of ads, I did make the effort to look up the game, because I thought it seemed to good to be true that a company was hand-crafting different levels of puzzles like this. I hoped it would’ve been real, even so. But no, it’s not. The games that these ads promote are almost always dumb match-3 trash that can churn out a million levels in rapid succession.

So why do these ads exist even after we’ve seen through the veil? There’s a lot out there on this particular phenomenon, and it all boils down to one actual truth: Bold lies pay off. It gets attention and eyeballs on a product, and if a percentage of those people lied to stick around to play, then you convert them even though you lied to them.

I’m not that up on advertising rules and laws, but this does seem to be a type of advertising that is forbidden in many other areas. Companies are prohibited from flat-out advertising one product or service and delivering a completely different one. Why is this different? Maybe not so much regulation or oversight, I don’t know.

At least one company noticed that these fake ads looked pretty cool — and actually made a real game from them called Hero Rescue. So I guess if you say a lie long enough, it becomes true?

Still annoys me that these ads exist, though.

5 thoughts on “Pet Peeve: The plague of misleading mobile gaming ads

  1. I have a draft post about this sort of bait and switch, but for a different one that looked to be a cool survival game but turned out to be a clan battle game. Duolingo gives me lots of ads like that. I’d seen the sort of puzzle game you’re talking about here (there seem to be many varieties on the same theme) but hadn’t downloaded any of them yet. There’s one where the “player” tortures a fish that I wanted to play so that I could save that poor fish, but I guess that game probably doesn’t actually exist, either.

  2. I had to do a bit of digging but I know I’ve seen a post on /r/Android gaming lauding that someone made the game from the fake ads.

    It was 3 months ago:

    Searching hero rescue on the Google Play store gets you several, but this one appears to be the favorite

    Hope that helps!

  3. I have been getting a lot of those very ads myself over the last week and it is a very good advertising campaign apart from the fact that it advertises the wrong product. The hook of showing the player fail really does tempt you to do better. There also seems to be quite a lot of them so it can’t have been a cheap ad campaign to develop or run.

  4. Honestly, it’s mostly YouTube’s fault. You cannot report ads or do anything like that. In the past, you’d see so many “indie mobile devs” that would rip off assets or pictures from bigger games in order to promote their games while the end result would just be anything but what’s shown in the ad. If a bigger studio were to sue them, the costs of the trial would be bigger than what they’re losing effectively (probably nothing).
    And while the false advertisement is illegal in a lot of countries: Nobody cares since nobody is suing. If YouTube would care about it, there’d be a report function for hateful ads or falsely advertising ads or other things. There’s no such thing. And that sucks.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s